Sunday, December 20, 2015

Lessons from Leningrad - the preface


(The beginning of a series on why we should be working fewer hours)
 
The siege of Leningrad, or more particularly at least one aspect of that four-year German assault on the Russian city about 70 years ago, was the genesis of these thoughts.

Oddly, it bears no direct relationship to the subject of what follows except that it is evidence of a passion and intent to achieve an end; passion and intent similar of what will be required if humanity is to emerge from its presently different, but equally dire circumstances.

The passion and intent as
illustrated by those at the
Vavilov Institute is what
is needed today.
The Germans had decided early in the 1940s that the capture of Leningrad was crucial to its plan to control the massive geographical space that is Russia. It laid siege to Leningrad in the summer of 1941 and in assuming its military might would quickly overcome the Russian city, overlooked the resilience and tenacity of the city’s residents, particularly the scientists and others responsible for the Vavilov Institute of Plant Industry. The men and women in charge of what was then one of the world’s largest genetic plant resources protected the seed-bank from the vicissitudes and violence of war. So intent on saving the seed-bank from the hungry people of Leningrad, and the broader impact of the war, many from the institute staff died of starvation at their desks, although surrounded by sufficient food to easily keep them alive.

That altruism and the belief in something bigger than themselves, a belief that ultimately cost them their lives, illustrates a behaviour presently largely missing from humanity. We stumble about locked in a deadly embrace with individualism, dancing to a tune played by the orchestra of economics so loud and so obtrusive that the idea of societal health and community wellbeing is not heard, or seen, and so ignored that it is in urgent need of help; help that only you and I can provide.

It is about now we need to consider the values, morals and beliefs of those from the Vavilov Institute and determine how we can apply human instincts to what is emerging as the greatest difficulty to ever confront humanity. Those from the institute had, it seemed, and innate sense that this nucleus of life in their care, a rare at the time and unmatched and irreplaceable store of seeds, was something of value vastly different and yet equally more important than the collapse of good sense and the subsequent violence and destruction in which they had become embroiled. Preservation drove their intent and from that arises a lesson from which we can learn.

Most any achievement in history made by man that was of any lasting and sweeping good arose when an individual, or group of people, who were transfixed by something bigger than themselves, something beyond what and who they were; something that had not emerged from a personal agenda, but something that was about enhancing the condition of mankind - it is not about the individualism that pervaded the 20th century and has entrenched itself in the opening decades of the 21st century.

This work found its feet in something that happened in Leningrad more than six decades ago and received impetus from a statement some 20 years ago by the Union of Concerned Scientists entitled “World Scientist’s Warning to Humanity”. That statement from 1,700 senior scientists, including 104 Nobel Prize winners, suggests we are living through something like a slow motion train wreck. The opening words say:

Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course. Human activities inflict harsh and often irreversible damage on the environment and on critical resources. If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the future that we wish for human society and the plant and animal kingdoms, and may so alter the living world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we know. Fundamental changes are urgent if we are to avoid the collision our present course will bring about.

This is about those urgently needed fundamental changes that in reality are too late, but it is important we act and act quickly to reimagine the world economy and understand why and how it has become an integral part of humanity  displacing those things that matter, such as collaboration, friendship and the deep and broader understanding that we are making this journey together and that each of us has an ethical and moral responsibility to those who went before and especially to those who follow, particularly those we will never meet.

What follows is not misanthropy (a dislike for humanity) or the mistrust of modernity, rather it is about embracing and celebrating the beauty and wonder of our civilization and at the same time suggests we revel in and exploit, as best we can, the wonders of man’s achievements.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

Sweden opts for six-hour days, better than our 'death sentence-like' behaviour


L
et’s just admit it. Most of us hate our jobs. Only about 31% of Americans feel “enthusiastic about and committed to their work and workplace”. Even for people who do get to work doing something they enjoy, the idea of doing it for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week, for the rest of our lives can feel like an early death sentence.

One country has decided to do something about it. Sweden, in keeping with their history of progressive social policy, has begun the shift to a 6 hour work day, with many of their largest employers already implementing the stress-reducing policy — and loving the results.

Thursday, October 1, 2015

Sweden sees it differently, Sweden wants just six-hour work a day


M

ost of the Western World, including Australia, wants to see workers with their shoulders to the wheel for longer hours, but Sweden sees things dramatically differently, it wants people to work six-hours a day.

This wonderful advance was discussed in a story published today in the Melbourne Age - “Sweden is moving towards a six hour working day as Australia's hours increase”.

“As work-life balance worsens in Australia, Sweden continues with its renowned family friendly policies by shifting to a six hour working day.

“Businesses across the Scandinavian country are implementing the change so workers can spend more time at home or doing the activities they enjoy”.

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

We need a Four-Hour Work Day, not a laissez-faire approach to hours


A

ny understanding of what troubles the world appears to escape Australia’s neo-liberal Federal Government.

Ian Harper - An economist who obviously
 doesn't understand, or is not allowed to
 address the troubles the world really faces.
 
Rather than be the solution to all our social problems, our prevailing market system is actually the cause.

The Harper Competition Review, driven by the Abbott Government, orchestrated by economists and obviously oblivious to what is really happening in the world, or has chosen to ignore them, and yet makes recommendations that takes us deeper into the difficulties that actually threaten humanity.

A story in today’s Melbourne Age - “Harper review: Plan to lift market restrictions to put consumer interests first” – tells of a plan to put consumers’ interests first, but actually ignores them completely.

The story says, “The plan is to put consumers' interests ahead of commercial interests, firing new market opportunities.”

Contraction rather than expansion is what needed and essential, if the world is, and by implication Australia, is to avoid a conflation of circumstances, ranging from resource depletion and catastrophic climate disruption.

Consumers actually need an outbreak of sanity combined with an equally generous helping of good sense to help them understand that in a world facing energy, resource and climate constraints, they need to be building a world in which they live with less rather than more.

The implication there of course, is that rather than extending retail trading hours, we should be structuring our communities so lifestyles can be similar, although different, and trading hours significantly shorter.

The ills of the world can be attributed to many things, but it is difficult to argue that the market system, so lionized by so many, is not the root cause.

Our developed nations are simply too wealthy and our consumption of energy and resource-rich goods and services is extreme already pushing the world into serious ecological debt.

Rather than adopting the Harper Review plan of extending trading hours and effectively allowing a laissez-faire approach, we should be discussing and moving toward reducing and limiting times for traditional business.

Instead of a 24/7 arrangement for retail businesses, our communities should be looking to move in exactly the opposite direction, that is a four-hour trading day, no overtime and no double shifts, but not including public services and primary producers.

Such a change would shift the emphasis away from simply making money and gathering “stuff” and allow people time in their communities to bond with those around them and build resilience in their neighbourhoods.

With just four hours on the job, people would live closer to their work and so would be able to walk or cycle, eliminating the need for road transport, making a significant difference to personal costs and easing the worsening of human damage to earth’s ecological systems, along with being far more resource efficient.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Our hunger for growth has human and ecological costs


The Grangemouth oil refinery -
belching gas by day
and 'Bladerunner' at night.
Capitalism and its inherent hunger for endless growth and the embedded dangers it has for earth’s atmosphere is epitomized in this 10-miniute video.

The shutdown” by Adam Stafford tells us about the Grangemouth oil refinery where two men were killed in an explosion.

He says Grangemouth belches gas by day and is Bladerunner by night.

The urgency of the need for profit comes at huge human and ecological cost.

Such a refinery would not be possible if we were to adopt a Four-Hour Work Day as our lifestyle would be dramatically different: it would be kinder to people and, of course, kinder to the environment upon which we all depend.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Mantaining an energy-rich lifestyle is self-deception


George Monbiot.
The idea that we might maintain present lifestyles while mitigating climate change is simply self-deception.

Our present energy-intense ways of living is a fallacy and can even be extended to the frequent national and international gatherings of those who call and argue for societal changes.

All these gatherings are of themselves energy-intensive and their very existence contradicts the values they espouse.

Guardian columnist, George Monbiot, writes about this contradiction and apparent lack of action in his latest piece: “ApplaudingThemselves to Death”.

He writes: “If you visit the website of the UN body that oversees the world’s climate negotiations, you will find dozens of pictures, taken across 20 years, of people clapping. These photos should be of interest to anthropologists and psychologists. For they show hundreds of intelligent, educated, well-paid and elegantly-dressed people wasting their lives.”

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Breaking all the rules of a '10-minute city'


City planning in a carbon-rich world is strikingly different from what will be needed, and essential, if we are to endure in a carbon-constrained world.

A new book released just this week by Melbourne’s Grattan Institute examines the planning that it claims is “broken”, particularly Melbourne and Sydney.

The book: “City Limits: Why Australia's Cities are Brokenand How We Can Fix Them” had been published by Melbourne University Press.

A story in today’s Melbourne Age headed: “Melbourne's planning disaster: jobs boom in CBD while affordable housing grows ever outwards in suburbs” discusses the disconnect between where the jobs are and where people can afford to live.

What wasn’t alluded to, but is a clear implication, is the wider cost to society in the carbon dioxide emissions resulting from the constant commuting forced upon people when jobs are in one place and their homes are in another, frequently an hour or more way.

Any reasonable response to climate change demands that we live with easy walking or cycling distance of where it is we work – some people have advocated that we live in a “10-minute world”, meaning that most everything needed for day-to-day survival is within 10 minutes of where we live.

Traditional commuting would fade away if we worked just four-hours each day


“Commuting”, as it is traditionally understood, would fade away if the Four-Hour Work Day became a reality.

With workers needing only to be at their respective workplaces for four hours each day, they would live quite close and so to get to and from their work in just minutes, either by foot or on a bicycle.

The idea of commuting is considered by The Book of Life in a piece entitled “On Commuting” in a section called The Sorrows of Work.

“Entering the carriage feels like interrupting a congregation. The cold air cuts into daydreams which must have begun far up the line.

“The settled passengers neither look up nor give any other overt sign of taking notice, but they betray their awareness of any new arrival by dextrously readjusting their limbs to allow them to struggle past them to one of the remaining unoccupied seats.

“The train moves off, resuming its rhythmical clicking along tracks laid down a century and a half ago, when the capital first began plucking workers from their beds in faraway villages,” the piece says in talking about commuting by train.

Saturday, February 28, 2015

We are paying now for capitalism in a dramatic way


Capitalism deserves much praise and is responsible for many wonderful things, but those benefits have come at a price, among them, a seriously damaged atmosphere.

The quartet of Alexander Jung, Horand Knaup, Samiha Shafy and Bernhard Zand have discussed both the value and disadvantages of capitalism in an article on Spiegel Online International.

In their story headed: “The Warming World: Is Capitalism Destroying Our Planet?” they say humans are full of contradictions, including the urge to destroy things they love. Like our planet.

The Four-Hour Work Day would derail capitalism and play a significant role in rehabilitating earth and renewing communities.

Naomi Klein backs, by implication, the idea of a Four-Hour Work Day


The idea of a Four-Hour Work Day is justified by many things, among them a changing climate, the blatant inequality arising from the existing economic structure and, critically and importantly, the desire to survive.

Naomi Klein.
The need to survive our changing climate has prompted Canadian author, journalist and social activist known for her political analyses and criticism of corporate globalization and of corporate capitalism, has made that point in an interview with Spiegal Online International.

A kicker headline on the story says: “Can we still stop global warming? Only if we radically change our capitalist system, argues author Naomi Klein. In an interview with SPIEGEL, she explains why the time has come to abandon small steps for a radical new approach.”

Embedded in Klein’s view is the urgent need to dethrone the capitalist system and work at creating a more egalitarian society and maybe one which would revolve around many of the ideas upon which the Four-Hour Work Day is built.